Our free blog is growing each week! The section that is currently most complete is for Secondary School Students
Did you know the plural of hypothesis is hypotheses? Maybe not, as at school they are only ever mentioned singularly, as you normally only have one per lab report. Your teacher may have asked you what you think will happen in the experiment they have told the class about. Whether it’s an online virtual experiment, one you do in the lab, or one your teacher just gives you the Results table for, they may have asked you what you think will happen. But, if they didn’t ask you why you think that, is it a hypothesis?
Not really, it depends what year you are in and how your school assesses you. However, if you are reading this, it’s safe to assume that either you or your school has decided you are competent enough to write your own lab report, so you need to think of both the What? And the Why? of the hypothesis, and write your ideas down clearly.
The good news is that if you have already read about How to write a Title and How to write the Background Information, you already have enough info in your lab report to do it. As explained in the Lab Report Overview, you do not have to write a lot for a hypothesis, the writing just needs to be clear and present enough evidence of research and thinking, that the person reading/marking your lab report knows you know what you’re doing!
If you have written your Title, you have your IV and DV variables. Now all you need to do is say that as the IV goes up or down, what will happen to the DV. Remember, the IV is what you change, the DV is what you measure. Of course, in science we want to sound a lot more sciency than “goes up” or “goes down”, so we use the words increase and decrease.
Thinking about what you have read about the experiment, seen before, how your teacher introduced the experiment, and looking at your variables table, what do you think will happen as you increase the IV?
Another piece of great news is, it doesn’t matter if you are right or wrong here. If you say the DV will also increase, and it goes down it doesn’t matter. If you say as the IV increases the DV will decrease, and when you start getting results the measurements actually get bigger, it’s fine—as long as you explain why you thought that might happen, and why what actually happened, happened :)
You can use the following structure in every lab report, just change the IV, DP, and choose either increase or decrease:
As the IV increases/decreases, the DV will increase/decrease, I think this because…..
So, it’s not the What? that gives you the marks, it’s the Why? that shows the person reading/assessing your lab report you know what you’re doing
If you have finished compiling, perhaps even writing, your Background Information section, then congratulations! you already have enough to finish this section. If you realise now that you don’t have enough to finish the Hypothesis Why? Section, then that’s also good as it’s shown you that the Background Information was incomplete and you could have dropped some marks, even though you had spent time researching the experiment. The more often you do this, the easier it becomes, and as you do your research you will be thinking ahead and only writing about the relevant scientific information for your project/lab report.
These are common questions, and common mistakes that your teacher will have seen again and again, but lab reports are there to help other researchers, all sections should make as much sense as possible on their own, without it being a hunting exercise for the reader to find the relevant information elsewhere, so don’t write “see above” or similar, and don’t copy and paste.
A short summary of the science in the Background Information is needed here, just enough to show you can link all the relevant bits together. As you offer detail in the Background Information, the relevant bits for the hypothesis might be broken up by further details not needed here. For example, you wrote four paragraphs for your Background Information, one sentence of each paragraph is needed to outline your hypothesis, so you pull the main point out of each one and say, in order, how they affect each other.
Let’s say the experiment is about the amount of sunlight on the height of pea plants. You might have written lots of great stuff about photosynthesis, glucose, water, how plants use glucose, time of year, etc. in the Background Information, but not all of it is needed here. A good writer can summarise, and show the reader how their ideas flow. Using the above sentence structure:
As the amount of sunlight increases, the height of the pea plants will also increase, I think this because there will be more light available for photosynthesis, which will produce more glucose. Glucose units are joined together to make cellulose, which is used to make the plant-cell walls. The more cells a plant can make, and the more energy (glucose) it has, the taller it can grow.
The above information would not have been enough for the Background Information, but the two sentence summary is sufficient here. Can you notice another difference here? There are no references, you have done that bit already. If the reader really wants to know more details (about the science or where you found it), they will go back to the Background Information. The idea here is just to summarise the science from your research enough, that it supports your hypothesis.
New blog pages that offer unrivalled free-to-use content are being added each week, so make sure you join our mailing list or follow us on social media (facebook and instagram) to keep up-to-date with new developments on the ABEL site.
If you are interested in personalised, individual attention — and you want specialised help related to your work or studies — click here to find your perfect consultant.
Alternatively, if you have specific questions about the company or you have a specific request, please contact us here, or at: info@abel-consultants.com or on 0034 673395438.